1. The punishment of the defendant shall be determined by six months;

2.Provided, That the above punishment shall be imposed for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

Punishment of the crime

On November 2, 2016, the Defendant: (a) 22:14 on November 2, 2016, 22:22:14, the Defendant: (b) obstructed the legitimate performance of duties by police officers in relation to the arrest of police officers in the act of committing a crime, by assaulting the police officer and G in order to witness and block the police officer’s arrest of the Defendant, G, who is the Defendant’s seat, by refusing to take a drinking alcohol test; (c) 2:14; (d) 22:14; and (e) 2:2:14; (e) the chest part of the chest part; and (e) the chest part of the F, who restrains it once, by assaulting the police officer’s chest part on one occasion.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and E;

1. A copy of photographic data, or a copy of the work site in D District;

1. Application of statutes governing on-site CCTV CDs;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution [the scope of recommendation] The basic area (from June to January 1, 200) of Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution of Official Duties (the decision of sentence] / The crime of this case was committed by assaulting a police officer in the course of performing official duties. However, the defendant's age, sex, environment, background, means and consequence of the crime, etc. are to be taken by taking into account all the sentencing conditions, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, circumstances of the crime, means and result, etc., and the sentence as set forth in the Disposition.