[Defendant A] Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months

However, the above sentence shall be executed for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

[2015 Highest 2751]

1. Defendant A

A. On June 22, 2015, the Defendant engaged in unlawful uttering of official document: (a) on the street above the main point of the name “E” operated by the Defendant in Gyeyang-gu, Young-gu; (b) on the ground that he reported to F on the 112 main point of “E” operated by the Defendant; and (c) accordingly, sent back to the site by the head of the police station G border in the Goyangyang Police Station, who was arrested as a flagrant offender and was required to verify the identity of the Defendant; and (d) received I’s driver’s license from B to conceal the fact that he was arrested as a flagrant offender and requested to verify the identity of the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant used the driver's license in the name of the Seoul Regional Police Agency, which is an official document.

B. On June 23, 2015, the Defendant: (a) drafted a written confirmation of the arrest of flagrant offenders who were arrested as a flagrant offender under the suspicion of assault against F at the Goyang Police Station G District located in the former J around the same time on June 23, 2015; (b) recorded I’s name in the column of “the above confirmation person”; and (c) sealed I’s name in the name and submitted it to H.

Accordingly, the defendant forged another person's signature for the purpose of exercising the right.

2. Defendant B

A. The Defendant reported 112 of the Victim F (47 years old) to the victim F (47 years old) at the time, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph 1(a) and at the place specified in paragraph 1(a), and assaulted the police officer to move out to the main points of Ma-dong A, and the date of disturbance and the victim’s Da Da son was kn

B. When it is anticipated that aiding and abetting the unlawful uttering of official documents should verify A’s status, which was sent to the site at the same time and at the same time and at the same place, the Defendant: (a) sent a driver’s license for pro-friendly I who was in his possession to H for the purpose of identification verification.

Accordingly, the defendant has prevented A to illegally exercise the driver's license under the name of the Seoul Regional Police Agency, which is an official document.

[2015 Highest 3460] Defendant Koyang-gu K.