logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.02.16 2015고단872
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 2014, the Defendant, as if he/she had a studio building and cash of an amount equivalent to 700 million won at the market price to the victim C (n, 44 years of age) who came to know through a marriage information company around the same year, had a studio in excess of 300 million won and had a 300 million won in cash

7. The first police officer suggested the victim's spouse to live together on the premise of marriage, and the victim was living together with the victim from around that time until February 2015.

In fact, the Defendant thought that he would use the deposited money that he paid by the studio lessee to use in advance and to change the deposited money that he possessed by the studio tenant, and not only did he own a building or cash owned by the Defendant at the time, but also did not have the bank debt amounting to 40 million won as an bad credit holder. On the other hand, despite the fact that he did not have any intent or ability to repay the deposited money even if he borrowed money from others because he did not have any certain property or income, the above victim C was given a deduction of the deposit money from the director on August 8, 2014 to the above victim C in accordance with Article 204 of the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City D Building 204, Seocho-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter referred to as "the studio tenant) to the effect that he would pay the deposited money immediately if he borrowed 4 million won due to a shortage of money, he received the deposit from the victim to the bank account under the name of North Korea on August 21, 2014.

In fact, the Defendant continued to use the money borrowed from others as personal living expenses, even if he/she did not have any intent or ability to repay the money with the money borrowed from others for the foregoing reason, notwithstanding that he/she did not have any intent or ability to repay the money, the above victim under Article 204 of the D Building No. 204 of the D Building No. 204 of Sept. 26, 2014 loaned the money borrowed from others as bonds with high interest. The principal would be repaid without a mold, and the principal may be repaid even if he/she leases the studio owned by him/her.

“......”

arrow