1. The Defendant’s KRW 15,00,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from July 8, 2015 to January 20, 2016.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On June 22, 1993, the Plaintiff is a legal spouse who has completed a marriage report with Nonparty C (hereinafter “Nonindicted Party”) on June 22, 1993, and has a child of 1 South and North Korea under the chain.

B. The Defendant becomes a non-party and a female who is Dong Dong Dong-dong women, and became aware of the non-party who is a natural South-North Korea at a meeting of Pungsae-dong club around 2005 and came to have a close relationship with the non-party from around 2007 to around 2007. During that process, the Defendant considered the Plaintiff as a head for a long-distance travel with the Defendant and the non-party in a nearby Mungse-Seng ( Home Pungs) around 2010. On May 2015, the Defendant and the non-party were to have a witness at the place of natural traveling within the hospital during the process of receiving the disc treatment of the same hospital (E Hospital located in D).

C. According to the Non-Party’s mobile phone Kakao Stockholm restoration data (Evidence A8) secured by the Plaintiff, the Defendant and the Non-Party along with online communication, such as the division of the following expressions: (a) the Defendant and the Non-Party, along with a small-style daily dialogue with which only the persons closely related and separately related with the above group are given and received; and (b) the expressions of “voluntary harm” and “self-harm.”

The non-party is subject to the plaintiff's enforcement, and he is above.

From August 2007 to the second half of 2014, the author prepared a self-written statement (Evidence A4) and a certificate (Evidence A12) to the effect that the defendant had sexual intercourse several times with the defendant in the Maurel located in Incheon for five to six years from the time of port. The witness was present in this court and testified that the non-party and the defendant had sexual intercourses over a considerable number of times from August 2007 to the second half of 2014

(However, the statement on the settlement of related telecom is somewhat different from the trading method of the defendant's account. (The statement on the settlement of related telecom).

The Plaintiff filed for a divorce on the grounds of the existence of the above facts and the failure of the marital relationship thereby, and the instant lawsuit is pending.