1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 20,000,000 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from September 24, 2015 to May 18, 2016.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On July 8, 199, the Plaintiff is a legal spouse who has completed a marriage report with Nonparty C (hereinafter “foreign person”) on July 8, 199 and has two children under the chain.

According to the statement of the non-party and the defendant, the defendant is the father-Nam who became aware of the non-party who is a sex in the drinking place.

B. In 2015, the Plaintiff was suspected of having a suspicion as to the Nonparty’s external rating, and the Nonparty was the same by means of a black box installed on the Nonparty’s vehicle.

4. 30. 30. Driving confirmed the fostering of conversations with the Defendant.

Examining the contents of the conversation, the following circumstances are revealed.

(1) The Defendant used the Nonparty’s title “pon” to the Nonparty with the full recognition of Nonparty’s daily territory, and was in a relationship in which only those who have a close and separate relationship with the Nonparty, such as a minor soil and a sense of good customs for his work day, was friendly with each other.

(2) On May 2, 200, the Nonparty informed his family members, including the Plaintiff, of the fact that “the bus is on board and across a local area” and, in fact, promised to be 1 stuffed at a nearby place prepared by the Defendant, by combining the Defendant with the confidential interest at 3 p.m. after the Nonparty’s retirement.

In the above dialogue, the Nonparty and the Defendant agreed on whether the Nonparty would pass through the house after leaving the house, and the combined time schedule, etc.

(B) At the end of Taiwan, the Defendant was asked to the Nonparty, “I have been asked to the Nonparty, on the other hand, whether I would have no problem,” and from the Defendant’s point of view, the Defendant’s wife’s child was scheduled to be silented at his wife.

Accordingly, the plaintiff was not the non-party to whom his house was located in order to keep the defendant on his own Saturday.

In the vicinity of the house, the Nonparty and the Defendant were on board the Defendant’s automobile (D), and the Nonparty and the Defendant were on board the said automobile to the hotel E located in Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan City.