Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for four months, by a fine of 5,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 20, 201, the Defendants’ joint crime victim Chungcheong-dong group established a "promotion plan for the support project for the well-being facilities with an amount equivalent to 75% of the project cost, instead of receiving subsidies from the Young-dong-gun, in lieu of receiving the subsidy from the deaf-do-gun, if the Defendants were to be selected as a new subsidy project operator for the manufacture of alcoholic beverages around January 20, 201, to strengthen the industrial competitiveness, which is the department of Young-dong-dong-dong-dong-gun."

A. E’s crime related to the lewdness facilities, which is the EF, was newly constructed in accordance with the said plan, in accordance with the foregoing plan. The fact was that the said new construction work was completed at a cost of KRW 30 million,00,000,000 for the said construction work. However, as the construction cost of KRW 40,000,000 for the said new construction work, the victim was deceiving the victim to receive the subsidy.

E From April 12, 201 to June 30, 2011, Defendant A, a construction business entity, had Defendant A newly built obscenity facilities in the above G from April 12, 2011 to June 30, 201. From the end of June 2011, the Defendants filed an application for subsidies related to the construction of well-being facilities in the F office located in the above H, and the victim public officials I filed an application for subsidies related to the construction of well-known facilities in accordance with the above plan. The actual construction cost is KRW 30 million, and the construction cost is KRW 40 million, while Defendant A completed the construction cost, the Defendants filed a false construction contract and tax invoice with Defendant B (hereinafter “J”).

After all, E, by deceiving the above I, received KRW 30 million from the injured party under the name of the support project for the well-being facilities, at the same time, received the indirect subsidy by false application or other unlawful means, and the Defendants knew that E was unlawfully receiving the subsidy in order to assist the crime of E, and then, at the office of Defendant A, located in Chungcheongnam-dong, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, from the end of May 2011.