(영문) 창원지방법원 밀양지원 2020.06.25 2019고단381

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 창원지방법원 밀양지원 2020.06.25 2019고단381

공무집행방해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant had been dissatisfied with the police officer’s speech and behavior belonging to the police station B police box, who was dispatched to the previous police station as a reported case for himself.

At around 21:30 on July 15, 2019, the Defendant was found in the B police box located in the Gyeongnam-gun, and was under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant carried out a yellow scambing that “I will not be so far. I ambling. I amb off the front of the police box. I ambling that “I ambling the front of the police box. I amb off the front of the police box.”

This was recommended by the police officer D, who belongs to the above police box, to read "I will not see this ..................", however, I refused to leave the police box, "I will die at the time of one person's demonstration," and "I will see to the police box," and "I will see to the police box," and "I will see to the police box," respectively.

Accordingly, the police officers within the above police box recommended the defendant to return home several times on the same day, and the police officers, at around 21:41 of the same day, she saw that they were able to see the iron stoves and yellow stoves attached to the plastic stoves in possession of the defendant, and she saw that "she was off off the clothes of the dog in vain vain in vashes," and she led D to her flab by hand at around 21:43 of the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties of police officials on the receipt of reports and civil petition information.

around October 21, 2019, the Defendant, “2019 Highest 569,” entered into the residence of the victim F, who was in the Republic of Korea, from around 21:00 to around 21:0, 2019, and was not corrected.

Therefore, although the victim rejected the defendant's "Mada-gu," the victim's residence was neglected, and the victim's residence was invaded against the victim's will by entering the living room where the victim's residence was located."

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Polices with D and F.

유사 판례

-창원지방법원 밀양지원 2017.09.14 2017고단328

-창원지방법원 밀양지원 2013.12.19 2013고정81

-창원지방법원 밀양지원 2016.12.15 2016고단499

-창원지방법원 밀양지원 2016.05.12 2016고단38

-창원지방법원 밀양지원 2013.10.10 2013고단393