A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 2013, the Defendant, at the end of Songpa-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, went home with the victim D, who is a workplace volunteer in Songpa-gu, and returned home with the Defendant, was frightened, and the Defendant was frightened by the victim so that the victim was her frightened, and her body cannot be accumulated up on the road. The Defendant cut off the victim’s cash amounting to KRW 700,000,000,000, one resident registration certificate, one SK Card, one copy of the company bank card, and one cellular phone amounting to KRW 50,000,000,000,000 in the market price, including one copy of the company bank card.

2. Around 14:00 on August 31, 2013, the Defendant, within a taxi with no known number near Sungnam-si E, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft by galloning one set of 2 mobile phones in the market price of KRW 1 million owned by the victim from the victim F, in a taxi with no knowledge of the number near Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si; and (b) galloning one set of gallon phones in the market price of the victim’s ownership; and (c) galloning one set of gallons

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

2. Each police statement concerning F, G, and D;

3. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police seizure records;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime, the choice of imprisonment;

2. Of concurrent offenders, the punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into account the various circumstances shown in the proceedings of the instant case, such as the fact that the Defendant had been punished for the same kind of larceny several times, despite the fact that the Defendant had several records of punishment for the sentencing of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act, and that the Defendant did not make all efforts to repay damage, such as agreement with the victims, etc.