Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Power] The Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years on October 16, 2013 by imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny, etc. in the Seocho District Court’s territorial branch branch on October 16, 2013, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on October 24, 2013, and is currently under suspended sentence.
【Criminal Facts】
피고인은 2015. 3. 31. 20:40경 속초시 교동 673-1에 있는 속초농협 하나로마트 엑스포점에서 물건을 구입하는 척 행동하다가 주변에 사람이 없는 틈을 이용하여 그곳 매장에 진열되어 있던 피해자 속초농협협동조합 소유의 시가 12,200원 상당인 자연란 20개, 시가 2,200원 상당인 콩나물 1봉지, 시가 3,500원 상당인 메추리알 1봉지, 시가 980원 상당인 깻잎 1봉지, 시가 3,400원 상당인 국산 콩찌개두부 1개, 시가 3,650원 상당인 풀국산단단부침두부 1개, 시가 1,460원 상당인 초코우유 2개 등 시가 합계 27,390원 상당인 물품을 피고인 가방에 몰래 담아 가지고 가 이를 절취하였다.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. The police statement concerning B;
1. Each CCTV image photograph, seized material site photograph, and CCTV CD;
1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on details of goods inquiry;
1. In light of the relevant statutory provisions regarding criminal facts, Article 329 of the Criminal Act of the relevant criminal facts, the grounds for sentencing selecting imprisonment [the scope of recommending punishment] the grounds for sentencing of general property [the grounds for sentencing of imprisonment] the mitigated area (general larceny in April to October] (the person subject to special mitigation] and the grounds for refusing to punish [the decision of sentencing] imprisonment for four months: The defendant committed several offenses with the same veterinary laws and committed several offenses, and committed again the same multiple criminal offenses without being familiarly considered during the period of the same suspended sentence (207, 2007, 2010, and 2013). In addition, the defendant committed several offenses with the same criminal records, including being taken three times the suspended sentence (3rd, 2007, 200, and 2013), the fact that the defendant committed the same multiple offenses without being able to reach a planned crime in light