logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원천안지원 2020.08.24 2019고단3189
사문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2019 Highest 3189"

1. Forgery of private documents and display of private documents resulting from the preparation of a certificate of borrowing;

A. On January 29, 2019, the Defendant forged private document: (a) borrowed KRW 35 million from I to the Sung-dong, Sung-dong, Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu; (b) as if he/she was delegated by J; and (c) said I stated “J”, “K”, and “Sho-ho” in the debtor column of the “certificate of monetary loan loan for consumption; and (d) affixed a seal under the name of J prior possession of the Defendant.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged a copy of the SJ, which is a private document related to rights and obligations.

B. At the same time and place as above, the Defendant used the forged loan certificate as if it were a document duly formed.

2. Forgery of private documents and display of private documents resulting from the making of a borrow note;

A. On May 29, 2019, the Defendant: (a) settled the amount borrowed from I at a location below the Sung-dong, Sung-dong, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu; (b) as if he was delegated by J; and (c) marked the Defendant’s seal on the side of the “debtor: J(K)” of the “written loan for consumption of money” prepared and kept in advance by J.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged a letter of borrowing in the name of J, a private document concerning rights and obligations.

B. At the above time and place, the Defendant used the forged receipt as if it were a document duly formed, with I who knew of such forgery.

3. Forgery of private documents and uttering of private documents by proxy form;

A. On July 24, 2019, the Defendant forged private documents indicated “name J and Q apartment R” in the column of “a letter of delegation,” which was kept at the place by notary public law firm P of Dong-gu, Nam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Incheon, as the delegating box of “name J and Address P, Seo-gu Q apartment R” in advance.

arrow