beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.
However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendants: (a) were married with their husband and wife; (b) the Defendant Company D against the victim working in the same workplace as Defendant B, committed the two projects with a promising business in real estate development projects and IT-related fields; and (c) intended to receive a high interest if the business fund is lent, and conspired to remove money in the manner of suspicioning the victim.
Accordingly, around July 15, 2013, Defendant B made a false statement as to his completion and credit with the purport that “E” in the “E” clothing store in which he and the victim work together with the company located in Seongbuk-gu, Sung-gu, Sungnam-si, Seoul, had a large number of high-class apartment buildings due to the business prior to the towing, and all of it was the business wrong, but at the present time, the amount of KRW 300 million has been invested in the telecom, making profits every month, and the husband has a very promising business outlook.” Defendant A made a false statement as to his completion and credit with the victim’s telephone around the 15th of the same month, and Defendant A made a false statement to the effect that “A shall pay the principal after the month when he has lent KRW 20 million to purchase the iron farm land, and shall pay KRW 5 million to this person at that time.”
However, at the time, the Defendants were listed as bad credit holders due to failure in the business around 2011, and there was no particular property or income, and there was no investment in 300 million won in Mour. As above, even if they borrowed money from the victim, they merely thought to be used for the debt repayment to a third party, living expenses, etc., and there was no intent or ability to repay the principal and interest as agreed.
The Defendants, as such, deceiving the Defendants and receiving 20 million won from the victims to the bank account (G) in their names on the same day. The Defendants, including transfer of 20 million won from the victims.
9. Until December 27, 200, 100 million won was received in total on three occasions as shown in the annexed list of crimes.
Summary of Evidence
1. Part of the Defendants’ legal statement 1.