1. As to the Plaintiff, the Defendant’s KRW 354,678,521 and KRW 56,531,025 among them, the remainder shall be from August 11, 201, and the remainder shall be 298,147.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff’s illegal investigation of the investigator of the Security Command against the Plaintiff 1) around 1973, when he was in active service at the Army, the Defense Security Headquarters (former Armed Forces Security Headquarters; hereinafter “Security Agency”).

In collusion with D at the time, the Plaintiff embezzled money for business purposes between 1971 and 1973, and issued an emergency order on economic stability and growth (hereinafter “emergency order”) around 1972.

(2) On March 17, 1973, security investigation officers conducted investigation on the charge of violation of the Act and possession of guns, etc. without obtaining a warrant of arrest or detention, and conducted investigation into the Plaintiff by the following: (a) on the 25th day of the same month, the Plaintiff re-influences the Plaintiff and detained the Plaintiff without a warrant of April 6, 1973; (b) whether the Plaintiff was willing to gather a bribe or embezzled public funds during CCOM’s employment; and (c) whether the Plaintiff received a bribe or embezzled public funds.

During that process, security investigators continued to engage in adviser, assault, and intimidation, such as leading the Plaintiff’s father and vice versa, leading the Plaintiff to E, who was the Plaintiff’s father and the Plaintiff’s advisor, leading the Plaintiff to emotional pressure, failing to sleep, etc., and led the Plaintiff to cruelly, and led the Plaintiff to a cruel act. At the request of investigators, the Plaintiff led the Plaintiff to the charge of occupational embezzlement, etc.

(hereinafter referred to as "the illegal investigation of this case") B.

(1) The plaintiff, who was found guilty, was found guilty, was found to be guilty, and the plaintiff was found to be liable to compensate the plaintiff for the amount of the incidental operation funds that the plaintiff in collusion with D, from August 10, 1971 to March 1, 1973, the plaintiff consumeds the amount of the incidental operation funds that D stored for the plaintiff from August 10, 1971, or failed to hand over part of the amount of the incidental operation funds to his successor. 2. The sum of F representatives G around April 6, 1972.