A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 27, 2014, at around 23:20, the Defendant sent to Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, after receiving 112 report as a taxi fare, and confirmed the details of the report to the reporter, and Dara to the slope E (the age of 43) affiliated with the D District Unit of the Seoul C District Police Station D District, Seoul, which identified the reporter, “I must do so, how much money was paid, I want to see how you want to see how you want to see and return back to the above E while going off the side glass of the above E, which interfered with the above E and going back from the above E,” and thereby interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the police officer’s criminal investigation and maintenance of order by taking one time at the right direction of the above E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the grounds that the suspended sentence is more than that of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., that the defendant is pening his mistake in depth, that the defendant appears to be an contingent crime committed under the influence of alcohol, that he will not repeat again, and that the defendant has no record of criminal punishment for a considerable period since 198).