Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On April 1, 2017, at around 23:00, the Defendant sold a total of 75,300 won for youth E ( South, 16 years of age), F ( South, 16 years of age), G ( South, 17 years of age), and H ( South, 17 years of age) from “D main points” operated by the Defendant located in Gyeongnam-si.

As a result, the defendant sold drugs harmful to juveniles.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E, F, G, and H;

1. Investigation report (as to the issuance of resident registration certificates):

1. A copy of the business registration certificate, receipt [the defendant and his defense counsel], as the defendant demanded E, etc. to present an identification card and confirmed that all adults are adults, there was no intention of violation of the law;

The argument is asserted.

The witness E, F, G, and H stated in this Court are very old, so they could be sufficiently suspected as a juvenile, and even if the above juvenile has a forged identification card or his/her photograph as an adult person, it was presented to the defendant that the above juvenile had a forged identification card in addition to his/her identification card or his/her photograph.

Even if it seems easily possible to distinguish the case, (The defendant presented the recent resident registration certificates issued by all four persons, including E, etc.)

However, it was necessary to forge his/her identification card with his/her photograph attached, and all four persons, including 16 years of age, 17 years of age and 17 years of age, were in possession of the forged identification card.

E, E, F, G, and H are relatively consistent in their statement in relation to when and when the investigating agency and this court asked the Defendant whether or not the Defendant requested the presentation of an identification card, whoever occurred well, and whether or not the Defendant had been aware of the fact that E, F, G, and H are able to recognize credibility (E, etc. is mainly Madropo in the penal provisions of Grast Republic.

After that, I asked the defendant who was unable to take the action, and stated that the category of the person who was below H was drank by the relevant H."

On the other hand, the defendant is not sufficient to raise.