1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months;

However, the above punishment shall be imposed for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 20, 2018, Defendant A operated the “F” on the Daejeon E and the first floor of the crime (Defendant A, Defendant B, and Defendant D). Defendant B had Defendant B take charge of the overall management of the game rooms, such as the management of customers and employees, game methods, and exchange guidance, and had Defendant D employ Defendant D as an employee to take charge of the remaining business, such as the care of customers and the cleaning of the game room.

From April 14, 2018 to the 20th day of the same month, the Defendants: (a) from the aforementioned “F”, the Defendants, unlike the rating classification, set up 80 games in which a special card, which is a special card to be paid to a transpume, is paid according to the display of the background screen of a certain pattern; and (b) provided that a separate score system is operated by calculating a specific score of the card as a specific score, and (c) provided customers with a revised and modified “G” game machine for use; and (d) requested an unspecified number of customers who find the place to put cash in the game machine and exchange money with the score obtained through the game, they made the money exchange business operator in cash after deducting 10% of the score recorded in the IC card from the next toilet of the said game site.

As a result, Defendant A and Defendant B provided game products different from the contents classified by the game products management committee in collusion with an influence in name, and exchanged tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products. Defendant D knowingly assisted and aided the act as an employee with knowledge of the above facts.

2. Part of the crime that was controlled on June 18, 2018

A. Defendant A, Defendant B, and Defendant D D (hereinafter “Defendant D”) operate a re-illegal game site even though they were under control around April 20, 2018 while operating the game site, as set forth in paragraph (1), while around April 20, 2018. Defendant B is in charge of “head of division” as set forth in paragraph (1), and exchange work to C, and Defendant C.