The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In addition, there was no fact that the Defendant sent a police officer, and even if so, there was a fact that the Defendant sent a police officer.

Even in the case of police officers' improper performance of duties, police officers are selected in the process of resisting the police officers' improper performance of duties.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty is erroneous in misconception of facts or misapprehension of legal principles.

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court on the grounds of unreasonable sentencing (1.5 million won of a fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

가. 사실오인 또는 법리오해 주장에 대한 판단 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하면, 피고인은 판시 일시, 장소에서 손님들에게 욕설을 하는 등 행패를 부리다가, 그곳 E의 112신고로 출동한 경찰관이 귀가를 종용하자, 욕설을 하며 발로 경찰관의 오른쪽 허벅지를 1회 차 폭행하여 경찰공무원의 정당한 직무집행을 방해한 사실을 인정할 수 있을 뿐이고, 이와 달리 경찰관이 별다른 이유 없이 피고인에게 수갑을 채우려 하였고, 이러한 경찰관의 부당한 직무행위에 저항하는 과정에서 경찰관을 발로 찼다는 피고인의 주장을 뒷받침할 만한 증거가 제출된 바도 없다.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of mistake or misapprehension of legal principles is without merit.

B. In light of the following: (a) the Defendant did not appear to have a genuine attitude against the Defendant while denying the instant crime; and (b) the Defendant had several criminal records related to violence, etc., which are disadvantageous to the Defendant; (c) the degree of assault committed in the instant crime is relatively minor; (d) the Defendant’s physical disability as a person with disabilities at the second degree of mental retardation is not in an economic situation; and (e) the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means, consequence, and circumstances after the instant crime, the sentence imposed by the lower court is somewhat unreasonable.

The defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is justified.

3...