logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.08.30 2017고단895
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 19:00 on May 9, 2017, the Defendant called “2017 Highest 895,” and called “Is the victim’s Do party room under the influence of alcohol,” and went out of the Do party room under the control of the victim C, and the customers in the Do party room were urged to go home by the police officers dispatched to the victim’s 112 report, but the police officers returned to the 112 report, and then returned to the 10:22 on the same day, the Defendant took the Do party room to read “Is the fright to go back to the Do party room,” and let the fright customers who were in the Do party room under the influence of the victim C with sound, and left the place of the frighting customers, such as threateninging the above customers by drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's party funeral business by force.

The defendant of "2017 Highest 1185" is a victim E (V, 78 years of age) and a mother and child.

At around 23:20 on May 11, 2017, the Defendant asserted that, in the residence of the victim in F at F at F at F at F at F at F at F at F at F at F at F at F at F, he/she would have been aware that he/she would have been aware of his/her head, and that he/she would continue to have a head of the victim's head, who was the victim's own head, he/she saw the 4,000 m of the market price of the victim at F at F at F at F at F at F.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 895"

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. C’s statement protocol 2017 Senior 1185;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. E statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to an investigation report (as to the confirmation of damage caused by damaged glass);

1. Relevant Article 314 of the Criminal Act and Articles 314(1) and 366 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes are many criminal convictions for the same kind of reasons for sentencing, the fact that the prosecution has taken a final position after the prosecution, and the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc.

arrow