logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.03.19 2018고단1695
절도등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

Where a defendant fails to pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be the day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. 절도 피고인은 2018. 2. 18. 15:15경 서울 금천구 B호에 있는 C에서 그곳 종업원인 피해자 D의 감시가 소홀한 틈을 이용하여 시가 1,000원 상당의 추억의 꽈배기 1개, 시가 2,520원 상당의 스위트 골든볼 1개를 가지고 나와 절취하였다.

2. On February 18, 2018, from around 15:15 to 15:35 on the same day, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s business operation by force by force, such as: (a) the victim was discovered of larceny at the places specified in paragraph (1) from around 15:15 to around 15:35 of the same day; (b) the victim was able to take a bath to the victim, namely, “no money.........” The franchise”; and (c) the victim was exempted from the flachie; and (d) flachi

Summary of Evidence

1. Written statements of victims of D, E, and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (verification of the site of the case and reproduction of CCTV image data / CCTV in the case site / analysis of video images on the field of the case / investigation

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business and the selection of fines) concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, etc.;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow