A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a manufacturer who produces concrete sculptures in the name of "E" in Asan City D.

On April 5, 2017, no person employed a person who does not have the status of sojourn eligible for job-seeking activities. However, on April 5, 2017, the Defendant employed the F of Lesia’s nationality at the intervals of KRW 70,000 per day without having the status of sojourn eligible for job-seeking activities at the above workplace, and employed the F of Lesia’s nationality at the intervals of KRW 70,000 per day, and as shown in the attached list “Defendant’s List” as shown in the attached Table, 36 foreigners who did not have the status of sojourn eligible for job-seeking activities from around that time to April 17, 2017, who did not have the status

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written employment statement;

1. Accusation of an immigration offender;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements to a charge;

1. Article 94 subparagraph 9 of the relevant Act and Article 18 (3) of the Immigration Control Act, the selection of punishment for a crime, and the selection of imprisonment for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) appears to have a large number of foreigners employed, the employment period is not long, there is no record of the same crime, circumstances leading to the crime, etc.);