Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

At around 15:00 on June 10, 2012, the Defendant, at around 15:0, 15:00, got married by the Defendant’s great couple, who committed suicide from the Sungdong-gun D around one year and two months prior to the death of the Defendant, was found to be the victim E (the age of 78) and C not to have the right to demand the performance of the right to demand the performance of the right to demand the performance of the right to demand the performance of the right to demand the performance of the right to demand the performance of the right to demand the performance of the right to demand the performance of the right to demand the performance of the right to demand the performance of the right to demand the performance of the right to demand the performance of the right to demand the performance of the right, and then, the Defendant

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and C;

1. A report on investigation (a statement by a police officer visiting the police station);

1. Application of the written diagnosis of injury and Acts and subordinate statutes on injury to E;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties.

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order

1. Around 15:00 on June 10, 2012, the Defendant, at around one year and two months prior to the Defendant’s suicide in Sung-gun, Sung-gun, Sung-gun, Kim Sung-gun, had been found to have been unable to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation.

2. Determination

A. There is a statement of C and E in the major evidence that seems to correspond to the facts charged.

However, in relation to the time and place of the Defendant’s assault, the Court stated that “the Defendant, along with the police officer, laid down the son’s body, and immediately went against C,” as follows: “The Defendant, along with the police officer, tried to go against C.” (the period in which the Defendant had received the custody of the body).