beta
Text
1. The plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
Reasons
1. According to the overall purport of the statements and arguments by Gap in charge of damage compensation liability set forth in the evidence Nos. 2, 4, 6, Eul, and Eul evidence Nos. 5 (including spot numbers, if any) and Eul evidence Nos. 2, 1, 5,00, and Eul evidence Nos. 5 (including spot numbers), the following facts are acknowledged: (a) around 15:00 on June 10, 201; (b) the defendant, who committed suicide by the defendant before around 15:2 months before his/her maturity, stated that he/she would not have the right to exercise his/her right to exercise his/her right to exercise his/her right to exercise his/her right to exercise his/her right to exercise his/her right to exercise his/her right to exercise his/her right to exercise his/her right to perform his/her rights; and (c) thus, he/she saw the plaintiff Eul and the plaintiff Eul, while having his/her horse dispute with the plaintiff, and used the plaintiff Eul to perform his/her her her her wmbal.
According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiffs for damages caused by the above illegal acts.
2. Scope of damages.
A. According to the overall purport of the statements and arguments in the evidence Nos. 7-1 and 3-1 of the evidence Nos. 7-1 and 3-1, the fact that Plaintiff A paid KRW 150,880,00,000 for treatment expenses, which was the sum of KRW 50,000,000,000 for March 19, 2013 due to the above injury, and KRW 50,000,000 for March 20, 2013, and KRW 150,000,000,000 for February 16, 2013, and KRW 220,00 for treatment expenses. The fact that Plaintiff A paid KRW 68,520,00 for treatment expenses due to the above injury is recognized.
B. As to the amount of consolation money for determination of the consolation money, it is reasonable to determine consolation money to be paid by the Defendant to KRW 500,000 in the case of the Plaintiff A, and KRW 300,00 in the case of the Plaintiff B, in full view of the health class, degree of injury, background of the tort of this case
C. (1) In the case of Plaintiff A’s assertion, the Plaintiff spent the medical expenses of KRW 890,220 from March 19, 2013 to June 5, 2014 for the Defendant’s tort, and the Plaintiff B’s allegation.