A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 5, 2010, the Defendant, in a “D” restaurant operated by the Defendant in the Gyeongbuk-gun C around February 5, 2010, will have the victim E find the victim “30 million Korean Won in the military unit.”

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, even if the defendant receives the money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to find the injured party's children in the military unit.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received the remittance of KRW 30 million from the victim to the account under the name of the Defendant on February 9, 2010 under the pretext of solicitation around February 9, 2010.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial recording of the accused's statements in the seventh public trial records;

1. Recording of the witness E's statement in the second public trial records;

1. Some statements made to the accused in the protocol of interrogation of the suspect to the prosecution (including the E part of the statement);

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserts to the effect that the defendant did not deceive the victim and did not have any intent to commit fraud.

그러나 이 법원이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사실관계 내지 사정들, ① 피고인은 미군부대 사령관 부인을 통해 피해자의 아들을 취직시켜 주려고 하였다는 것이나, 위 사령관 부인이나 심부름 역할을 하였다는 미스터리의 구체적인 인적 사항과 연락처도 밝히지 못하고 있고, 실제로 사령관 부인을 통해 제 3 자를 미군부대에 취직시킨 경험도 전혀 없는 점, ② 피고인의 변명과 같이 2008. 경 피고인의 아들을 미군부대에 취직시키려고 사령관 부인에게 2,000만 원을 건네주었음을 인정할 객관적 자료가 없고, 그 무렵 피고인에게 미군부대 취업 명목의 돈을 함께 건넸던

F makes a statement to the effect that “The Defendant was given KRW 10 million as his front check, but the check was returned by the Defendant after about one year.”