logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.10.02 2019고단4576
특수폭행
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 12:24 March 20, 2019, Defendant A lent money to the victim B (Nam, 40 years old) at one main point of “D” in the underground floor of the building of Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Ground C, Jongno-gu, Seoul, and was rejected, Defendant A collected glass cup, which is a dangerous object on the table.

In this respect, the defendant carried dangerous objects and assaulted the victim.

2. At the same time and place as set forth in paragraph (1) of this Article, the Defendant collected plastics, which is a dangerous article on the table table, from which the victim A (the age of 46) scam scam scam scam scam, and then sold twice the center part of the head of the victim scam scam scam scam to the victim for about two weeks.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Prosecutorial suspect interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. At the time of dispatch of the scene of crime, the application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of suspect A, investigation reports (explosion and investigation of the scene of crime), photographs, field photographs, etc. of the body part of A, diagnosis certificates, investigation reports (the securing, etc. of CCTV screen images inside the establishment where the crime has occurred), investigation reports (the E Communications, which is the suspect B);

1. Defendant A of the pertinent legal provisions pertaining to criminal facts: Articles 261 and 260(1) of the Criminal Act; Defendant B who choose a fine: Articles 258-2(1) and 257(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (Defendant B) for discretionary mitigation

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (Defendant A) of the Criminal Act for the detention in a workhouse;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (Defendant B)

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (hereinafter "Defendant A") of the provisional payment order [the defendant A] has a history of criminal punishment for committing violent crimes more than seven times, and the same kind of punishment is again same.

arrow