Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
피고인은 B 시트로 엥 C4 피카소 승용차의 운전 업무에 종사하는 사람이다.
1. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Measures Taken after Accidents) and violation of the Road Traffic Act (Drinking) on June 4, 2018, the Defendant driven the above vehicle while under the influence of alcohol of 0.19% among the blood transfusions around 07:40 on June 4, 2018, while driving the vehicle along the five-lanes from the south intersection of Seoul Gangnam-gu to the new station distance slope, along the five-lanes from the south intersection of Seoul Gangnam-gu, along the five-lane, while changing the lane from the other intersection to the four-lane due to the negligence of changing the two-lanes from the other intersection to the four-lane.
D Driving, the left-hand side of the E New Zealand bus was received as part of the Defendant’s right-hand side.
Ultimately, the Defendant did not take necessary measures at the time of the occurrence of a traffic accident, such as immediately stopping and checking the state of damage, even though he damages the bus to cover approximately KRW 1,30,000 due to such occupational negligence.
2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (hereinafter referred to as "Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes") and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (hereinafter referred to as the "Act"), the Defendant continuously driven the said car at the border of the preceding paragraph at the time prior to the beginning of the preceding paragraph, and neglected to perform the duty of care in the front of the Seoul Gangnam-gu in front of the road along the second two-lanes from the 4-lane away from the 4-lane away from the area of the new calendar distance to the active duty, and caused the Defendant to go along the back of the HWz CLA45 car driven by the victim G ( South, the age 36) on the front side of the same lane. Accordingly, the Defendant got the victim I ( South, the age 52) who continued to go in front of the said passenger car while driving the said car at the front time.
Ultimately, the Defendant, due to the above occupational negligence, suffered injury to the victim G, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and injury to the victim I, such as catum salt, tensions, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment. At the same time, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim I.