1. The appeal by the plaintiffs (including the appointed parties) is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are the part resulting from the supplementary participation.

1. The court's explanation of this case is the same as the entry of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of the first instance except for dismissal or addition as follows. Thus, it shall accept it in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The following shall be added between the sixth, third and fourth of the judgment of the first instance:

G. On June 28, 2017, the Intervenor prepared an application for permission for development activities and documents attached thereto pursuant to Article 57(2) of the National Land Planning and Utilization Act and Article 9(1) of the Enforcement Decree of the National Land Planning and Utilization Act, and filed an application for permission for development activities with the relevant department on July 7, 2017.

H. Meanwhile, on May 15, 2019, TPP announced the position that “The Gun Planning Committee should not be opened in May 15, 2019,” and that “The Gun Planning Committee should be opened only in the case of obtaining consent from more than 80% of the 5 pages, TR, TTR, TTS, and TU residents.”

(i) An intervenor is several times.