A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Special larceny Defendant and B were able to open a door that does not correct any passenger car owned by others in order to raise the living expenses while setting up the living expenses at the Mapo-dong Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, and thought that cash, valuables, etc. in that place shall be stolen;

The Defendant and B found that, around August 24, 2015, the first floor parking lot located in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government around 01:25, there was no correction of the door of the victim E-Wz car owned by the victim D, and the Defendant A reported the network behind the said vehicle, and B opened a door for a vehicle not corrected, and entered the vehicle into the vehicle, and had one-way number of 50,000 won per the market price owned by the victim at that place.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property together with B.

2. The sole criminal conduct of Defendant A;

A. On August 23, 2015, around 23:50 on August 23, 2015, the Defendant discovered that, around August 23, 2015, the 1st floor parking lot located in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul was not corrected, and that, on the other hand, the 2,000 won in cash owned by the victim was removed.

2) On August 24, 2015, the Defendant committed the crime around 02:54, around August 24, 2015, at around 02:54, the first floor parking lot located in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, found that the door of the Victim D’s Ebsts was not corrected. The Defendant opened the first top door of the said vehicle and opened the vehicle into the vehicle and stolen the vehicle with two portable phones when the market price owned by the victim is for Samsung Galle ju (S4 mobilephone).

B. On August 25, 2015, the Defendant finds that the victim F and G larceny was in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul around the new wall, and that there was no correction of the language of the victim F’s I Poter owned by the victim F, who was parked therein, and that he opened a door behind the driver’s seat of the said vehicle and entered the vehicle.