beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for twenty-five years.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On December 2016, the Defendant in preparation for fire prevention of general buildings began to teach the victim B (n, 46 years of age) and around that time with the introduction of a branch person around December 2016. On November 4, 2017, when a person who suffered damage operated a trade name “D” in regular Eup/Myeon, the Defendant was living together with the victim at the inside of the above main place.
Although the Defendant provided the opening costs of the above main shop, and helps many other customers to work, it is easy to say, “In case other customers are in a way that they are in a way that they are in a way that they are in a way that they are in a way that they are in a way that they are in a way that they are in a way that they are in a way that they are in a way that they are in a way that they are in a way that they are in a way that they are in a way that they are in a way that they are in a way that they are in a way that they are in a way that they are in a way that they are in a way that they are in a way
Defendant 1 thought on January 2018 that she should remove the above main points while he/she was he/she he/she he/she accumulated complaints for the foregoing reasons, and planned to remove the main points, he/she purchased approximately 1.8L of gasoline contained in aquatic illness from “F” located in E at regular Eup/Myeon, and left it back to the empty bottle box located in the main points above the above main points.
Accordingly, the defendant prepared to set fire to and burns a structure.
2. On February 5, 2018, when the Defendant, on the grounds as described in the foregoing paragraph 1, had a complaint against the victim B (the age 46), the Defendant, on the same grounds as indicated in the above paragraph 1, went together in order for the victim to take care of the male customer who was on the main place on February 5, 2018, and brought about a dispute with the victim, who returned to the main place on around 11:00 on the same day.
The Defendant, at around 15:30 on the same day, was in possession of the victim who got out of the am and went back to the main place, she again gets back to the main place, and gets involved in the dispute, and was in possession of the victim in advance as described in the above paragraph 1.