The defendant is innocent.

1. On August 23, 2017, the Defendant stated the facts charged in the instant indictment in the public service center of the Daegu District Public Prosecutor’s Office, and around May 2, 2017, the date and time (the date of joint guarantee) of the facts charged in the instant indictment is “ around April 24, 2017.” However, it is confirmed that the date and time of the fact of the accusation (the date of joint guarantee) is indicated on May 24, 2017. On April 24, 2017, the date and time of the fact of accusation is indicated in the actual accusation (the date less than 18 pages of the investigation record). The Defendant prepared a provisional contract between the Defendant and the Defendant, “the date of the preparation of the provisional contract” (the date of April 24, 2017) and the date of preparation of joint and several surety (the date of May 24, 2017) and the date of preparation of the examination document “D” (the date and date of examination record) as evidence submitted.

In addition, C is confirmed on the date of preparation of joint and several sureties's letter of joint and several sureties(2017 May 2, 2017) in the monetary records, so it is written that 248 pages 27 of investigation records, 249 pages 125 of investigation records, and E in the above statement will be "E", which seems to be C's telephone number.

The prosecutor also called the above numbers to C.

It is clear that C does not directly see the situation at the time of the preparation of a joint and several guarantee certificate.

This confusion by the prosecution seems to have contributed to establishing the premise of the facts charged that D had been at the site at the time of preparation of a joint and several surety.

In the lower court, the case is examined as of May 2, 2017, which is the date and time of filing of a complaint.

hereinafter referred to as "the date of the case"

B (a) B (a factory lessee is below the factory owned by the Defendant).