logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.05.18 2016노633
무고
Text

The judgment below

Of them, the part against Defendant A shall be reversed.

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

, however, the defendant.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant A (unfair sentencing)’s punishment sentenced by the lower court to the Defendant (eight months of imprisonment) is excessively unreasonable.

B. Defendant B (1) In this case, the first proposal was made up of 50 pages 322 of the investigation records among the evidence list No. 322 (hereinafter “32 pages”) and the first proposal was made up of 288 pages 45 of the evidence list (hereinafter “28 pages 45”), following revision, and again, among the evidence list Nos. 45 and evidence list No. 293 pages 293 of the investigation records (hereinafter “293 pages 45”) and evidence list No. 50 of the evidence list, the criminal investigation records No. 325 pages 325 of the investigation records (hereinafter “325 pages 322”), and the content of the accusation was made out of May 15, 2015 (hereinafter “the victim”) and the content of the accusation was made out of A28, and there was no indecent act in the process of making it known to the victim.

In other words, A first prepared and delivered a written complaint on the 322 pages to the defendant. A had the defendant correct it, and deleted the part of intimidation on May 15, 2015 and the part of indecent act on June 1, 2015, and re-written a written complaint on the 288 pages. After which A had been deleted, the defendant, who is a mere agent of A, made a strong assertion that he/she re-written the above part and made a strong claim that A would re-written a written complaint, including intimidation on May 15, 2015 and the part of indecent act on June 1, 2015, to prepare a written complaint on the 293 pages and 325 pages, and as such, the defendant prepared a written complaint as requested by A.

by itself, the defendant conspiredd with A.

shall not be required to do so.

② The Defendant, upon receiving an agreement from A as a personnel record, said that he only told A to “abscison an agreement,” and did not set a specific ratio, and such a speech.

arrow