Text
1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On October 29, 2016, the Minister of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs entrusted business affairs related to the implementation of the qualifying examination for licensed real estate agents and conducted the qualifying examination for licensed real estate agents on October 27, 2016 (hereinafter “instant examination”). The details of the instant examination are as follows.
The subjects of the preliminary examination - Examination - The provisions relevant to the brokerage of real estate in the Civil Act and Special Civil Act - the second examination: The business affairs of the licensed real estate agent and the actual affairs of brokerage related to the registration of real estate transactions, the Acts and subordinate statutes related to the public disclosure of real estate (Real Estate Registration Act, Spatial Data Construction and Management, etc. Act) and the regulations relating to the real estate brokerage in the real estate law - the method of examination related to the first examination and the second examination in the real estate law - the first examination conducted on the same day (in the case of the first examination conducted at the same time, the second examination conducted by a person who has failed to pass the first examination shall be null and void) - The first examination questions shall be 5 multiple-choice questions, and the first examination questions shall be 40 points for each subject, and the second examination results shall be at least 40 points for each subject with an average of at least 60 points for all subjects - The second examination results of at least 10 points for each subject and at least average of at least 460 points for all subjects.
B. The Plaintiffs received an average point of 177.5 points in the second examination, and acquired an average point of 59.16 points in the second examination. Of the second examination issues of the instant examination, the Plaintiffs selected three times as the answer about the A-type No. 74 (B-type 75) text (hereinafter “instant text text”) of the Acts and subordinate statutes and tax-related Acts related to the disclosure of real estate among the secondary examination issues of the instant examination. However, the Defendant deemed the Defendant as a correct answer, and given the mark of the instant text to the Plaintiffs.
C. On November 30, 2016, the Defendant’s ground that the scores of the second examination among the instant examinations fall short of the average of 60 points for all subjects, which are the passing criteria.