1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 29, 2016, the Defendant implemented the qualifying examination for licensed real estate agents on October 27, 2016 under the Enforcement Decree of the Licensed Real Estate Agents Act (hereinafter “instant examination”).

B. Detailed matters of the instant test publicly notified by the Defendant on July 27, 2016 are as follows.

1) Examination subject - The first examination of real estate science (including the first examination of real estate appraisal theory) - the second examination of regulations related to the real estate brokerage in the Civil Act and the Special Civil Act - the affairs of licensed real estate agents and the second examination of real estate transaction reports - the Acts and subordinate statutes and the brokerage practice of real estate transaction reports - the Acts and subordinate statutes related to the public disclosure of real estate (the Registration of Real Estate Act, the Spatial Data Construction and Management, etc.) and the Real Estate-Related Acts and subordinate statutes related to the real estate brokerage in the real estate public law - The first examination and grading method as of July 27, 2016 shall be conducted on the same day after classifying the first examination and grading method as of the date of the public announcement of the implementation plan (the date of July 27, 2016) and the second examination, and the second examination shall be prepared on the OCR card, and the second examination and written examination in the form of five multiple-choice method shall be prepared on the OCR card, and the second examination and second examination shall be invalidated.

C. On November 30, 2016, the Defendant rendered a disposition of failure on the grounds that the Plaintiffs fall short of the average of 60 points of all subjects, which are the criteria for passing the first test of this case, (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 through 4 (including branch numbers for those with additional numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiffs' assertion 1) The issue No. A-type 64 of the first-class examination of this case (B-type 63; hereinafter "the issue of this case") is as follows.

the answer at this time is drawn.