beta
Text
The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than four months for the crimes of Nos. 1, 5, and 6 in the judgment of the court, and the crimes of Nos. 2, 3, and 4 in the judgment.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On July 17, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for a period of eight months in the Ulsan District Court for insult, etc., and on December 31, 2014, the Defendant became final and conclusive.
[2014Gohap294]
1. No false information shall be published with respect to any candidate, his/her spouse, lineal ascendant or descendant, or sibling, who is unfavorable to the candidate by means of a speech, broadcast, newspaper, communication, magazine, poster, propaganda document, or other means with the intention of preventing him/her from being elected in connection with the intraparty competition
C Political Parties registered preliminary candidates to the election commission on February 24, 2014 in relation to the D Market Election, which was implemented on June 4, 2014, E had been registered as a preliminary candidate on March 21, 2014. H National Assembly members registered as a preliminary candidate on March 21, 2014 without registering preliminary candidates, and on March 2, 2014, H Assembly members declared to be a candidate for the C Party D Market, and on May 12, 2014, H Assembly members decided to be a candidate for the C Party D Market on May 12, 2014.
On the other hand, on April 2014, the Defendant: (a) sought an office from J to request I to re-enter the office; and (b) sought from the above L, “it would be difficult to re-enter the office because he voluntarily resigned to carry out an election campaign for the President in 2012,” and (c) put a notice on the Defendant’s Twitter account (M) stating, “I will be difficult to re-enter the office; (d) I will not be elected as a candidate in the D market C political party competition.”
At the defendant's house located in Ulsan-gu N around April 14, 2014, the defendant tried to criticize the defendant's Twitter account (M) that "I would be unable to re-enter because H had O in fact."
However, it can be said that the F is human being who sent it.