logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2014.03.11 2013고단3420
강제추행
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the defendant is the head of the branch office of Changwon-si C building D, Changwon-si, and the victim E (V, 21 years old) is the employee of the above company.

The defendant, taking advantage of the position of the place of occupation, tried to expect the victim to not easily resist and forced the victim to commit an indecent act.

1. On April 22, 2013, the Defendant, around 15:30 on April 22, 2013, committed an indecent act with the victim’s hand and rhumbbbbbbbbs by force, after having the victim go on the top of the office of the above company in FK7 car class.

2. The Defendant, at around 17:00 on the same day as indicated in the above paragraph 1, committed an indecent act by force, such as using sparing the victim in the trade spons in the Sungsan-dong, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, and committing an indecent act by force on the part of the victim who was seated on the spons in the above vehicle at around 17:10.

3. On May 2013, the Defendant, within the office of the Defendant, committed an indecent act by force on the part of the victim, by cutting the bucks of the victim who sited with the victim and mashed with the victim’s bridge between the Defendant’s bridges, and by holding the victim’s bucks only once.

4. Around 12:00 on May 16, 2013, the Defendant committed an indecent act by force, such as taking the victim into the above company’s office with a wall and taking the victim into custody.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are the crimes falling under Article 298 of the former Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 11574, Dec. 18, 2012) and can be prosecuted only upon the victim’s complaint under Article 306 of the same Act.

However, since the victim revoked the defendant's complaint on March 8, 2014, which was after the prosecution of this case, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow