logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2020.02.13 2018고합247
특수폭행치사
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On October 17, 2018, the Defendant discovered the victim D (the 49-year-old) who was a fluorous victim from the living room in the workplace in Gwangju Special Metropolitan City, 00:25, at the living room in the workplace in Gwangju Special Metropolitan City, to enter a bed toilet, and pointed out that “the victim is using a toilet and fluorting the head of the toilet,” but she was at sight with the victim, so that the victim’s face may be dlusent, and the victim’s face may be dlusent, flusent, and flusent, she was flusent, and she was flusent to use the victim’s dlusium in a bed, and then she was flusent to use the dlusium in a bed, and she was flusium in Gwangju Special Metropolitan City by using the head of the 3rd and flusium, and the victim’s 2014 pul.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. Prosecutions and police interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Investigation reports (medical records inD);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to prosecution and forwarding documents;

1. The assertion and judgment of the accused and the defense counsel under Articles 262, 261, 260(1), and 259(1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts

1. Summary of the assertion

A. The Defendant asserted with the victim that he was the head of the victim due to the drinking of the main branch in the middle of the Do and the main branch in the middle of the Do, and there was no fact in the price of the clothes, and the person who purchased the clothes is not the Defendant but the Defendant.

B. Since the victim died of medical malpractice, such as improper treatment of the hospital, there is no causal relationship between the harmful act of the defendant and the death of the victim.

2. The following facts are acknowledged according to the evidence established prior to the facts charged.

A. Defendant, victim, I, G, and H are at a restaurant.

arrow