Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for four months.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant.

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are married, and Defendant B is a couple, and Defendant B is a person operating a cafeteria “C”.

Defendant

B around March 30, 2018, around March 30, 2018, entered into a driver's accident insurance contract with the victim D Co., Ltd. and the insured as Defendant A.

The above insurance shall be stipulated in a special agreement on the burden of injury while driving a two-wheeled motor vehicle, and the insurance money shall not be paid if any cause for the payment of the insurance money prescribed in the insurance contract occurs due to a sudden and incidental accident that occurred while the insured drives a two-wheeled motor vehicle during the insurance period, but if the insured fails to prove the fact that the two-wheeled motor vehicle is used once or is regularly driving the two-wheele

Defendant

A, around 19:10 on July 18, 2018, operated a two-wheeled motor vehicle of F large-scale on a 19:10 on a two-wheeled motor vehicle and delivered food to the above restaurant, A was affected by an accident corresponding to the other motor vehicle at the 134-lane 134 of macrosi-si ex officio, and was hospitalized in the H Hospital located in G in G at the macrosi.

1. When the Defendants came to know of the fact that insurance proceeds are to be paid in the case of the driving of one-time Obaba, they gathered that Defendant A had regularly operated Obaba, thereby being paid insurance proceeds from the victim, and Defendant B requested the victim to pay the insurance proceeds by cell phone display around October 29, 2018.

On November 1, 2018, Defendants made a false statement to the effect that “the instant accident is one-time accident that occurred in the course of getting off the otoba and getting off the oba or off the oba,” to the employees belonging to I of the I in order to conduct an accident investigation with the delegation of the victim at a place in which the obaba is not located.”

However, in fact, Defendant A has repeatedly operated Obane while delivering food to the above restaurant.

The Defendants, as seen above, deceiving the victims through employees belonging to the damage adjusting service, and deceiving them on December 10, 2018 from the victims.