The defendant shall be innocent.

1. Facts charged;

A. On March 201, the Defendant access to the Internet Child Care Integrated Information System at “D Child Care Center,” which is a child care facility operated by the Defendant in Gyeyang-gu Incheon, Incheon, and received subsidies of KRW 10,437,200 for a total amount of four times until June 201, by entering the false fact into the Internet Child Care Integrated Information System, wherein E, a two-year-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-in-age-old-in-year-old-in-year-old-in-age-old-in-age-old-in-age-old-in-year-old-in-age-old-in-age-old-in-child care, was provided with a mixed organization of the three-year-old-in-age-old-in

B. Also, according to the 60 pages of the investigation records (administrative disposition order) around January 31, 2012, the Defendant appears to have made a clerical error on January 20, 2012 as of January 31, 2012.

For the foregoing reason, even if the child care center was suspended for two months from July 1, 2012 to August 31, 2012, the child care center was operated normally on July 2, 2012.

2. Determination

A. We examine the facts charged of this case. The defendant's receipt of each subsidy in the same way as the stated in the facts charged of this case is based on a false or unlawful method, and it is based on the premise that an order to suspend the operation of a child-care center is valid and lawful.

B. First, the above 1. A

We examine the facts charged in the paragraph.

According to the evidence submitted by the prosecution, the defendant assigned the child E to two years of age in the Integrated Information System for Infant Care from March 2011 to June 2011, but actually took care of the child G to three years of age. Although he allocated the child G to three years of age in the Integrated Information System for Infant Care, he was actually taking care of the child at two years of age in fact, and the defendant provided a mixed infant care for the two years of age in the above case.