1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On April 22, 2016, the Plaintiff was newly appointed as a middle school teacher and served as the Plaintiff.

B. On April 4, 2018, the Defendant requested a heavy disciplinary decision against the Plaintiff to the General Disciplinary Committee of Public Officials in Gyeonggi-do on the ground that the Plaintiff violated Article 63 (Duty to Maintain Dignity) of the State Public Officials Act by committing an indecent act on the part of the victim C (hereinafter “victim”) under the influence of alcohol on the street 111-ro 22-gil, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, about November 4, 2017, on the ground that the Plaintiff committed an indecent act against the victim (hereinafter “the instant disciplinary cause”).

C. The Gyeonggi-do General Disciplinary Committee on Public Educational Officials decided to dismiss the Plaintiff on April 25, 2018, and the Defendant dismissed the Plaintiff on May 9, 2018.

hereinafter referred to as "disposition of this case"

(D) On May 28, 2018, the Plaintiff appealed and filed an application for an examination of appeal with the Appeal Commission for Teachers on May 28, 2018, but the said application was dismissed on August 23, 2018. [The fact that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition, entries in Gap’s evidence 1 through 3, and the purport of the entire pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

가. 원고의 주장 1) 원고는 이 사건 징계사유와 같은 준강제추행을 하지 않았다. 원고는 술에 취해 두 다리 사이로 고개를 푹 떨군 채 잠이 든 여성을 깨우고자 등을 두드리며 깨우는 행동을 하였을 뿐, 어깨동무를 하거나 다리를 만지지 않았고, 추행의 의도나 목적도 없었다. 2) 원고가 실제로 한 행위는 등을 두드린 것에 불과한 점, 직무와 무관한 사적영역에서의 우발적인 행위인 점 등을 고려하면, 이 사건 처분은 원고의 행위에 비하여 지나치게 가혹한 것으로 재량권을 일탈남용한 것으로 위법하다.

(b) as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes;

C. Determination Nos. 3 through 5, and Nos. 2-1 through 7, as to the non-existence of the grounds for disciplinary action No. 1.