beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On March 1, 1989, the Plaintiff was newly appointed as a teacher of Busan Elementary School. On March 1, 2016, the Plaintiff was a public educational official who served as an assistant principal at Busan Elementary School and served as an assistant principal at Busan Elementary School from March 1, 2017 to March 1, 2017.
B. On September 29, 2016, the Busan Metropolitan Office of Education received a civil petition against the Plaintiff’s educational authority, violation of human rights, etc., and the head of the Busan Metropolitan Office of Education Office of Education examined the above facts on September 30, 2016; and on October 4, 2016, on October 5, 2016, on the ground that the Plaintiff violated the duty of good faith, good faith, and good faith; and on October 13, 2016, the Plaintiff demanded a decision on heavy disciplinary action against the Plaintiff to the General Disciplinary Committee on Public Educational Officials of the Busan Metropolitan Office of Education.
C. On October 25, 2016, the Busan Metropolitan Office of Education Public Educational Officials General Disciplinary Committee resolved on the demotion against the Plaintiff. Accordingly, the Defendant made a disposition of demotion against the Plaintiff on November 8, 2016. The Plaintiff dissatisfied with the request and filed an appeal review with the Appeal Review Committee for Teachers, and the Appeal Review Committee for Teachers revoked the said disposition of demotion on the ground that the procedural defect was found not indicated in the specific grounds for disciplinary action on January 18, 2017.
On February 24, 2017, the head of the Office of Education of the Busan East-gu Busan Metropolitan Office of Education re-requested a heavy disciplinary resolution against the plaintiff, and the General Disciplinary Committee on Public Educational Officials of the Busan Metropolitan Office of Education decided on the demotion against the plaintiff on March 21, 2017, and accordingly, the defendant made a demotion against the plaintiff on April 1, 2017.
(hereinafter referred to as “original disposition”). ① On March 10, 2016, in the course of the E frequency hall located near the relevant school, the son’s first fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent (hereinafter referred to as “Disciplinary Reason 1-1”), and on March 21, 2016, in the F cafeteria located near the relevant school, the fluent fluent fluent at the first test of all employees.