logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2014.07.04 2014고단28
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 28, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act, etc. in the Changwon District Court’s territorial branch branch on July 28, 201, and on April 24, 2011, the Defendant completed the execution of the sentence in the Busan Correctional Institution.

1. Violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act;

A. On July 17, 2012, from around 21:30 to April 21:30, 2013, the Defendant: (a) established 40 outdoor game machines in Tong-si and C Gameland on the second floor, which did not receive a rating from the Game Rating Board; (b) had many unspecified customers who found the game input cash in the said game machine and carried out the game; and (c) paid the remainder after deducting a fee of 10% by converting the points obtained from the said game into KRW 5,000 per point.

As a result, the defendant provided game products that have not been classified for use, and exchanged points obtained through the use of game products for business purposes.

B. The Defendant, a gameland operator without a trade name, offered the operation of the gameland by allowing F to take charge of the management of the gameland, settlement of profits, exchange, etc. as a "management department" in order to operate the gameland without a trade name on the first ground floor of the F and the Tong-si.

From May 2, 2013 to 15:30 of the same month from May 2, 2013, the Defendant established 40 games in the above gameland, which did not receive a rating from the Game Rating Board, and had many unspecified customers find such places input cash in the above game machine and play the game, and paid the remaining amount after deducting 10% of the fee by converting the score obtained from the game into 5,000 won per point.

As a result, the defendant provided game products without rating classification in collusion with F and exchanged points obtained through the use of game products.

arrow