A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 5, 2016, at around 03:45, the Defendant: (a) committed assault, on the front of the C convenience store located in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant: (b) stated that “A police officer affiliated with the Seoul Dobong Police Station D commander of the Seoul Dobong Police Station D commander called, “I h h h h h h f h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to E;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act / [the scope of recommended punishment] There is no basic area (from June to one year and six months) (the person subject to special sentencing) (the decision of sentence / the person subject to special sentencing) [the decision of sentence] reflects the defendant's wrong, the defendant has no record of being punished for the same kind of crime, and the defendant's age and living relationship are considered as a whole and determined as the sentence as ordered.