logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.11.01 2018고단5367
상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 24, 2018, around 23:15, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties and the Defendant injured the Defendant: (a) on the street in front of the Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, by receiving a report from 112 that the customer would not get a taxi due to alcohol, and (b) on the ground that he sent a taxi engineer, and the slope F sent the taxi engineer to the patrol vehicle and sent the driver to the driver, and (c) took a bath on the ground that the slope F, who was driving on the driver’s seat of the driver, was sent to the driver from the patrol to the driver on one occasion, and sent the f’s name at the driver’s seat at one time, and the f, who was on the driver’s seat, was sent to the driver at the patrol.

The breath theory is called “,” and the breath balth balth sphere was shake, and the right balth sphere was cut one time.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties concerning the protection of the lives and bodies of the people of the police officers, and at the same time, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim slope F, such as damage to the right-hand satisfaction combined security guards, which requires approximately eight weeks medical treatment.

2. On June 24, 2018, around 23:29, the Defendant: (a) arrested a flagrant offender due to interference with the performance of official duties, as prescribed in paragraph (1), at the D District District of the Incheon Bupyeong-gu Incheon Bupyeong Police Station D, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon; and (b) destroyed the repair cost of KRW 77,000 by walking the automatic entrance installed in the earth due to his own launching, thereby placing the front door.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the goods used by public offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F, H, E, or I;

1. Written estimate and written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to damaged and destroyed photographs, CCTV image data, and their pictures regardless of the victim's hole;

1. Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (the point of injury), Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of damage to goods for public use) and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

arrow