The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a vehicle C Ecoos.

On July 22, 2014, at around 08:25, the Defendant driven the above vehicle and driven the two-lane road of the Gu-U.S. P. P., the Gu-U.S.-U.S. P., which is in the Gu-U.S. P., the Defendant driven the vehicle at a speed of about 40km from the Y.S. P. to the Gu-U.P.

At the time, there are many parts of the construction work on the right side of the road at the time, so the defendant engaged in driving of the motor vehicle had a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the front side and the left side and the right side and the steering system of the motor vehicle and accurately manipulating the steering gear.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to perform his duty at the front time of the car, and instead neglected the part of the victim D (the age of 32) who was working on the right-hand side of the road in the direction of the sea-speaking.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by the above occupational negligence, committed an injury to the victim, such as the closure frame of a copy of the inside the right, which requires treatment for about six weeks, but immediately stopped, and escaped without taking necessary measures when a traffic accident occurs.

2. The crime of violation of Article 5-3(1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes is an intentional crime established when one knowingly recognizes the fact leading to death and injury

(대법원 1999. 11. 12. 선고 99도3140 판결). 피고인은 2년전 사별한 남편을 기리기 위하여 매일 아침 금오산 기슭의 법성사라는 사찰에 가서 기도를 해왔는데 사건 당일에도 법성사로 가던 중에 퍽 하는 소리를 듣고 조금 더 진행하다

It has been changed that it was completely different from the fact that it was known that the container was shocked and the container was used again after the stop, and that it was completely different from the fact that the container was shocked.

At the time, he was carrying out the repair work on the right side of the old Bridge, but he was lowering the attitude.