A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 6, 2012, the Defendant is a person who violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act not less than twice, such as: (a) a summary order of a fine of one million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Gwangju District Court on March 6, 2012; (b) a fine of five million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Gwangju District Court on June 27, 2013; and (c) a summary order of five million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act.

On December 25, 2017, while under the influence of alcohol leveling to 0.10% or more during blood transfusion, the Defendant driven a DNA strawing car from the Do near the restaurant where the trade name in the south-gu of Gwangju is unknown to the Do near the restaurant in which the trade name in the south-gu of Gwangju is unknown, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, 83, 2017.

2. The Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol at the time of the pertinent day, was driving the said rocketing car at around the same time, and the Defendant continued to drive the said rocketing car on the surface of the Fstrost in Seo-gu, Seo-gu with three-lanes of the Fstrost in Gwangju. The Defendant, while neglecting his duty of care to safely drive the Habro, by neglecting his duty of care to properly operate the Habrop car, and by neglecting his duty of care to operate the Habrop car at the right side of the said rocketing car (62 years). At the same time, the Defendant, while neglecting his duty of care to accurately operate the Habro and the operation of the Habrop car at the right side of the said rocketing car, suffered injury, such as the Habrost’s salt and the tension which requires two-day medical treatment, and at the same time, did not immediately destroy the said Karen car to the extent of KRW 1,486,191, and did not immediately stop necessary relief.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Each photograph (the list Nos. 5, 23-1);

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. A copy of a medical certificate;

1. A copy of a written estimate;

1. Investigation report (the application of the above dmark);

1. The CD;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of an inquiry letter, each summary order, and each statute;

1. Article 148-2. of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense;