logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.07.12 2018나75278
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff asserted through the insurance solicitor belonging to the defendant that entered into an insurance contract with the defendant on January 9, 200, D insurance (public notice interest rate) on November 29, 2002, and E insurance1 and 2 on July 27, 2004. ① The defendant neglected to provide the plaintiff with information duty and duty by continuing to send insurance-related mail to the wrong address from around 2015, and neglected to provide information duty and duty. ② The insurance solicitor of the defendant sent 00,000 won to the plaintiff with information duty and failed to take any measures or order, and the defendant neglected to provide 00,000 won with information duty and neglected to provide 00,000 won with information duty, and the defendant neglected to provide 00,000 won information duty and neglected to provide 00,000 won information duty and neglected to provide 00,000 won information duty and neglected to provide 00,000 won information duty and did not provide 000,0000 won information duty to the account.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by each description in Gap, Gap's 1, 3, 4, 12 through 15, 19, and Eul's Nos. 3 (including each number), namely, the plaintiff agreed to make automatic transfer of insurance premiums twice a month in entering into the above DD insurance contract.

arrow