logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.05.23 2017고정400
협박
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 11, 2016, at the Defendant’s house located in Seongdong-gu Seoul, Seongdong-gu, Seoul around 18:16, the Defendant: (a) placed the victim C (46 years of age) with the tax base of “the value of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base.

The claim for damages is also filed.

In order to transmit a text message, the victim threatened the victim by transmitting it.

2. Around October 12, 2016, the Defendant sent the victim a text message stating that “the victim shall be forced to capture a pair of fessp fessp fesp, store a fessp fesp, and leave the fesp fesp,” at the above Defendant’s house, thereby threatening the victim.

3. On October 12, 2016, at around 12:25, the Defendant sent the victim a text message stating that “a sprinker must be laid to a sprinker,” and that “a sprinker must be cut to a sprinker in the south of Gangnam,” thereby threatening the victim at the above Defendant’s house.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement protocol (Supplement of Complaints) made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (related to the receipt of certificates of results of the disposition of the case and text messages);

1. Relevant Article 283 of the Criminal Act and Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines for criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act was that there was a circumstance that could be taken into account the background of the instant case.

Even if the defendant committed the crime of this case several times and the harm and injury notified to the victim was considerably threatened, the sentencing conditions indicated in this case, including the defendant's age, economic situation, and criminal punishment, shall be determined as ordered.

arrow