logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.05.27 2016고단449
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On October 22, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1.5 million for a crime of violation of road traffic laws at the Jung-gu District Court on March 10, 2015, and a fine of KRW 2 million for a crime of violation of road traffic laws at the Jung-gu District Court on March 10, 2015.

[Criminal facts]

1. On January 1, 2016, the Defendant driving a bsular vehicle with approximately 500 meters alcohol level 0.113% alcohol level from the 500-meter section to the normal distance in the Jinyang-si, Jinyang-si, Namyang-si, Namyang-si around 03:20 on January 1, 201, while under the influence of alcohol level 0.113% in blood.

Accordingly, the Defendant, who violated the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol again.

2. The Defendant is a person engaged in the duty of driving Bomb vehicles.

On January 1, 2016, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol as set forth in paragraph 1 of around 03:20 on January 1, 2016, and proceeded along one lane among the three lanes in the direction of the etroke in the direction of the etrop in the direction of the etrop in the direction of the parallel.

At the same time, the defendant has a duty of care to take into account the traffic conditions of the road as a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle, and to prevent the accident in advance by safely driving the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and found that the D taxi vehicle driven by the victim C(64) stops in the front line of the front line of the front line of the vehicle and took the action of operation late. However, the Defendant was not able to teach the front line of the vehicle driven by the Defendant and received the front part of the vehicle driven by the Defendant as the front part of the vehicle driven by the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused injury to the above victim due to the above occupational negligence to the victim E (the victim, 35 years of age), who is the passenger of the above taxi, for approximately three weeks of medical treatment.

arrow