A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 18, 2006, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1 million as a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) from the Sungnam branch support on September 18, 2006, and on July 16, 2013, the Seoul Central District Court issued a summary order of KRW 9 million due to the crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (duplicative death or injury caused by danger) at the Seoul Central District Court.

Criminal facts

1. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person who is engaged in driving of a vehicle with C investment vehicle.

On March 13, 2017, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.080% during blood transfusions at around 20:35, while driving the said car at a level of 0.080%, and was also scheduled to keep the first half of it as well as the first half of it as the first half of it in the Southyang Sea, and the second half of it was scheduled to proceed separately from the direction of the maritime patrol box at the port of the contact.

In this case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering system, brakes and other devices of the vehicle with the driver's duty of care.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant neglected to do so and failed to do so, and caused the E-Bluri car driven by the victim D (33 Does) who was in the front signal of Defendant D (33) with the front part of Defendant’s car.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence, such as salt dynasium in need of treatment for about two weeks.

2. Despite the fact that the Defendant violated the provision prohibiting driving of alcohol twice or more, the Defendant operated a vehicle with low alcohol level of 0.080% under the influence of alcohol level from the 1km section to the place where the instant accident occurred, i.e., the trade cafeteria located in the Jnyang-si, Namyang-si, Namyang-si, Namyang-do.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Reports on traffic accidents, on-site photographs, and notification of the results of crackdown on driving drinking;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Judgment.