logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2013.12.04 2013가합606
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The defendant,

A. 25,500,000 won for each of the plaintiffs A, B, C, and E;

B. Plaintiffs D and G respectively KRW 51,000,000;

C. Plaintiff F.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant newly constructed the “P apartment” in the O of the Jeon-gun, Jeonbuk-gun (hereinafter “P apartment”) and recruited the occupants by converting the remaining households into the leased sale on or after July 4, 2007, after obtaining approval for the announcement of the recruitment of occupants on or around July 4, 2007.

B. Around 2011, the Defendant decided to make a conversion for sale in lots to the households leased as above among the apartment units of this case, and received applications from lessees for four times and conducted the preferential sale procedure against them, the Defendant Q as the staff in charge of the sales in the first floor of the management Dong, and had him take charge of the sale in lots and lease related to the apartment units of this case.

For this purpose, the defendant left Q Q bank account in the name of the defendant to manage the operating expenses of the defendant's corporate sense and sales office.

C. Q entered into a provisional contract or lease contract (hereinafter “each of the contracts of this case”) with the Plaintiffs under the name of “the sales office of the P apartment unit prior to New Construction Co., Ltd., Ltd.” using the corporate sense of the Defendant, which had been kept in custody, and received the provisional contract or lease deposit (hereinafter “provisional contract deposit, etc.”) through the account of the above North Korean bank account in the name of the Defendant, or directly paid by the sales office. Among them, the provisional contract provides that if a lessee terminates the contract without conversion into lots among the lessees who have been leased the apartment of this case, the provisional contract will preferentially be sold to the Plaintiff who entered into the provisional contract of this case.

No. 1 No. 544, Jul. 26, 2012, 201; the sum of the received amounts (per won) on the date of receipt of the contents of the Plaintiff’s contract (per won) on the date of concluding the contract on July 23, 2012; 2,000 2,000 3,000 B B B on August 6, 2012; the provisional contract on August 6, 2012;

arrow