The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On June 22, 2014, at around 00:50, the Defendant: (a) asked the Defendant’s pro-Japanese in front of the D Special Metropolitan City Ma, the Defendant: (b) asked the Victim E (the 17-year-old) female-friendly appearance G of the Victim F (the 17-year-old age-old) about whether there is a “mari-gu”; (c) during the period of punishment for each other, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, such as a fluoral fluor, where the victim was able to take a bath to the victim while doing so; and

2. Determination

A. The key issue of the instant case is whether the Defendant suffered injury by harming the victim.

B. Unlike the investigation agency, the victim stated that it is difficult to give credibility to the victim's statement, such as the victim's statement to the effect that he does not well memory as to the circumstances he got beyond this court, and the victim's friendship witness H also stated to the effect that he did not see how he exceeded the victim in this court. The witness I stated in this court that the victim was in the same way when she tried to injure the defendant; the contents of the defendant's legal statement and the attitude of the statement; the defendant's legal statement and the witness's attitude; the defendant and witness I, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone cannot be deemed to have suffered injury by the defendant in excess of the victim at the time, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this differently.

3. In conclusion, the above facts charged constitute a case where there is no proof of facts constituting the crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.