All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. Summary of the grounds for appeal (Defendant A);

A. In addition, there is no fact that there was no physical contact with the victim, and there is no fact that the defendant conspiredd with the co-defendant B with the victim.

B. The sentence (one million won of fine) imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court in determining the misunderstanding of facts, the Defendant may be recognized as assaulting the victim, as described in the facts charged in the instant case, along with Co-Defendant B and C. The victim, at the lower court court’s court’s trial, was under contact with the Defendant and Co-Defendant B while having franch due to the problem of assault and debt, and the Defendant and Co-Defendant B did not find the place of locked again, and the Defendant and Co-Defendant B did not want to bring ments away. The victim’s statement is consistent with the victim’s statement to the effect that the Defendants were flading and assaulting both arms of the victim. The victim’s statement is consistent with the victim’s statement to the extent that it was inconsistent with the victim’s statement to the extent that it was inconsistent with the victim’s statement to the extent that the victim’s statement was inconsistent with the victim’s statement of unfair sentencing. In particular, the victim did not appear in the victim’s statement to the extent of the victim’s injury.

However, the defendant does not seem to reflect the wrong.